Showing posts with label Facial Eczema. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Facial Eczema. Show all posts

April 23, 2014

New Zealand agricultural history. No 20. Importing exotic sheep breeds


Facial Eczema at Hopuhopu
Quarantine at Hopuhopu
Implications for sales 


By Dr Clive Dalton

Facial Eczema at Hopuhopu

The mixed breeds of hoggets at Hopuhopu quarantine station. 
The Texels were most prone to Facial Eczema
When the time got near to release the sheep from quarantine in 1990, news had spread that the Texels at Hopuhopu had been badly affected by Facial Eczema, and there was considerable internal debate about what to do about this.   First, there was the concern of shareholders accepting affected sheep, and secondly concern over them having to sell liver-damaged sheep to their clients. It was all about 'marketing ethics', and many MAF technical staff at Hopuhopu who had to work and treat the sheep were very concerned.

However looking back, and trying to get the full story now,  it seems as if the marketing gurus were happy to leave things in a state of  ‘buyer beware’. There could have been some nasty legal implications of course, but if there were, nobody can remember now.

The Waikato has always been a 'hot spot' for FE and it has a devastating effect on sheep, both externally (see photo), but more so in liver damage preventing the fungal toxin from being excreted. 
 
Photo shows some badly affected Perendale ram hoggets with FE showing skin lesions on face and ears. These sheep did not survive, even after treatment, as their livers were too badly damaged.

The breed was clearly too valuable for the Company to be over concerned about the effects that FE may have had on individual rams.  This lack of declaring the presence of FE in some sale rams really bothered the professional ethics of some MAF staff, and apparently some nasty internal memos floated around.

John Dobbie
John Dobbie of the Ruakura Genetics section told me of his concern after finding clear FE signs on the Texels when wool sampling at Hopuhopu, and putting it in a report to Ruakura Research Station Director Ken Jury, who called him to his office at 5pm one day for what John described as a real bollocking. 

John, being John, would not accept Ken’s reprimand and told him straight, as the facts were the facts.   Staff member Ian Malthus says he was ‘moved on’ to another MAF research job as a result of his ethical concerns, about offering rams for sale that were known to have had FE.  He openly voiced his concerns and he got the clear impression that he was speaking out of turn and the marketers didn't like it.

All the purebred Texel rams and ewes were sold from Hopuhopu and Robin Hilson remembers that Mount Linton took over the 180 unsold Texel crosses.  Robin says that as they had not been well managed, he had to hang on to them till the autumn as they were unsalable in the spring. He bought at least 150 younger Texel crossbreds and sold them on eventually.

In my view, the most likely reason for the poor Texel performance at Mount Linton was that they would all have had sub-clinical FE, and have compromised livers which would have taken a very long time to recover.  It’s now well accepted that affected livers never fully recover.

Peter Hoyle
MAF veterinarian Peter Hoyle who was responsible for regular visits and supervision of animal health at Hopuhopu remembers the FE outbreak well, and how the old ammunition bunkers on the property (which had been a WWII firing range) came into their own to keep sheep out of the sun during the day,  allowing them to feed at night. So there was plenty of evidence of clinical FE in the Texels.

FE and Finns
Everyone was surprised, and no doubt relieved, that the Finns didn't go down with FE like the Texels, and there was a fair bit of conjecture as to why.  Some came up with the theory that they must have genetically developed high immunity to pasture toxins over generations, although there was no FE disease in Finland. 

The Finn FE tolerance grew with the telling, and became a big marketing feature for farmers in FE prone areas.  Coopworth breeder Edward Dinger who has selected for FE resistance on the MAF Ramguard programme for 30 years, where rams are dosed with the FE toxin (sproridesmin), and who was in a small group that purchased 45 pure Finn rams at $1000 each, says that the Finn has 'useful but low FE tolerance to a level of 0.3mg sporidesmin/kg of liveweight'.

Dinger Coopworths and other Waikato breeders are dosing rams at 0.6 mg sporedesmin/kg live weight now, and have eliminated the effects of the disease, even in the most severe outbreaks.


April 13, 2012

New Zealand Sheep - Facial Eczema damaged liver

By Dr Clive Dalton

The fungus Pithoymyces chartarum is found in pastures mainly in the Northern parts of New Zealand, and in autumn after a summer dry period when a lot of dead litter has accumulated in the pasture base, rain and dew can provide ideal conditions for the fungus to produce spores in large numbers. But the spores can also be found in large numbers on new short fresh autumn grass.

The fungal spores, especially the freshly-grown ones produce a toxin called sporidesmin, which causes thickening of the bile duct and may even cause its complete blockage.

Sheep gall bladder punctured to show bile and healthy
bile duct entering the liver tissue

A damaged liver cannot get rid of waste products, and a breakdown product of chlorophyll accumulates in the tissues causing jaundice and sensitivity to sunlight.

Sunlight very quickly causes swelling and severe inflammation on exposed white skin parts of the body.

There can be some repair of the liver, but it depends very much on the level of damage. In a recovered liver you will see knew small lobes that have grown.

Sheep's liver cut through centre

The liver pictured above is from a 6-year-old ¾ Romney ewe with ¼ Finn. She spent 5 years of her life on a farm that is very prone to FE, so there’s little doubt that she will have experienced a toxin challenge and liver damage during those years. She has reared twins most years in her life and it’s amazing that she was able to do this.

In the picture at the knife point is a little motley yellowish tissue on the surface of the liver which shows toxin damage. A real badly damaged liver is like a lump of wood.

But note especially the nice new healthy liver lobe on the right of the picture, and the 3 new small ones at the top right, and how healthy the internal tissue is.

For the last two seasons, this old ewe has been treated regularly with a zinc-based nutritional supplement which has protected her from further liver damage by toxins, and helped to stimulate new healthy liver growth.

Internal signs of a dysfunctional liver
Often at post mortem of a ewe dying close to lambing, you'll find two dead almost mummified lambs insider her but great masses of fat in the body cavity which the liver has not been able to process to nurture the lambs.

April 2, 2011

Facial eczema – NZ disease scourge for 100 years

By Dr Clive Dalton


Clinical cases of Facial Eczema showing typical lesions on ears
and around they eyes, and sometimes along the back.


Problem for 100 years
For over a century now, Facial eczema (FE) has caused massive animal suffering and economic loss to New Zealand flocks and herds, and every year it still takes its toll. It’s a fungal disease of the autumn, thriving in a combination of soils still warm from summer, dead pasture litter, and moisture from autumn rains and heavy dews.

Looking down a microscope, it’s hard to imagine how the tiny hand grenade shaped fungal spores can produce a toxin that can permanently damage an animal’s liver, leading to photosensitivity, great suffering and often death. When cases get really bad the animal has to be euthanased. Stock sent for meat processing end up being condemned, as their flesh is jaundiced and has an unacceptable 'off' smell.

The Fusarium fungus (Pythomyces chartarum) which produces the spores, is common in many other countries such as Australia, South America and South Africa, but for some unknown reason does not produce the ‘sporidesmin’ toxin. The toxin is most dangerous from young rapidly-growing spores like the ones in the picture below.

Spores of the fungus Pithomyces chartarum

Finding the cause

Facial eczema has been known in New Zealand since the importation of modern grasses in the 1870s, and it was certainly reported by J.A Gilruth in the Department of Agriculture's Annual Report in 1897.

Finding the cause and working out prevention measures took 40 years of solid research, (including many setbacks) by scientists at the New Zealand government’s, Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Ruakura Animal Research station, working in close cooperation with local farmers desperate to find a solution, many of whom regularly lost more than half of their sheep flocks in bad years. It took them years to get over one bad FE year.

Farmer demands
In fact, it was farmer action led by a Waikato farmer, Mr F.C. (Togo) Johnstone in 1939, strongly supported by Waikato Federated Farmers, that got Ruakura under P S Smallfield to take a serious look at the problem. A long hard road of research was started and got a major boost in 1943 when Dr C.P. McMeekan was recruited from Massey College (later University) to develop the Ruakura Animal Research Station.

McMeekan recruited a team (many from overseas), to find the cause and then provide a prevention to the scourge causing massive economic losses on farms in the warmer northern parts of the North Island of New Zealand.

Today, with the climate warming and more dry summers, the disease is being found in many other areas of New Zealand.

When I arrived at the Whatawhata Hill Country Research Station in 1968, researchers had done most of the hard work. The fungus and its toxin had been identified, and treating animals with zinc salts was the accepted prevention.

Gladys Reid


Gladys Reid OBE

A famous part of the zinc research story was Mrs Gladys Reid who farmed at Te Aroha in the Waikato. There was always an argument, which continues to this day even after her death at age 92, as to who was first to ‘discover’ zinc to prevent FE. As a former dental nurse she knew about the qualities of zinc, and tried throwing zinc sulphate into water troughs with clear benefits to preventing the disease.

To her dying day, she declared that she told the scientists at Ruakura about the value of zinc, and that they needed to follow it up. She must have spent 30 years goading them on to do more, and they certainly didn’t like it, and to this day they claim to have discovered zinc before Gladys.

Things certainly got heated from time to time and much of it was played out in the local newspaper - the Waikato Times under farming editor Peter Bourke. I got involved in the cross fire at one stage when Scientific Liaison Officer at Ruakura and in the end, I and Dr Rex Munday were the only two scientists at Ruakura who Gladys would talk to, and who were in contact with her. We always listened to her, difficult though it was at times as she was so deep into biochemistry and certainly well ahead of my knowledge of the subject. Rex could certainly follow her theories and ideas. Scientists from all around the world kept in touch with her and used to visit her.

There was the famous letter from overseas addressed to ‘The zinc lady, Te Aroha, New Zealand’ that got to her with no problems!

Before she died, I managed to get most of her original papers and correspondence into the archives at the Hamilton City Council’s public library, where they are publically available. In my opinion, from reading all her original letters, she clearly was the first to see zinc as a practical preventative for FE.

But I don’t expect my former colleagues to ever agree with me, and even years after it was all over ( I thought !), I was reprimanded by the President of the Waikato branch of the NZ Institute of Agricultural Science, for some words I had written for a display in the Hamilton City Museum of Art and History on the history of FE research. My scolding was because I had ‘given overdue emphasis to the role of Mrs Reid in the story of FE research’. Certain scientists never gave up their pique.

What made things worse for them was that Gladys was awarded an OBE for ‘Services to Agriculture’, an honour she always felt was a ‘sop’ to compensate her for the years of insults and rebuffs she’d had from Ruakura scientists as well as MAF's Director General of Agriculture.

One of the wonderful switchboard staff at Ruakura - Ruth Utting, told me that she was told by certain scientists and the Director that if 'that woman phoned', she was to tell her the person she wanted was not available. Ruth told me that Gladys got wise to this, and once got her daughter to phone the Director who then handed the phone to Gladys!

Google ‘Gladys Reid’ for her obituary.

Easy for dairy farmers
Daily drenching dairy cattle with zinc oxide was easy for farmers, as for most of the year cows had to be dosed for bloat and were well used to being handled – almost opening their mouths when approached with a drench gun. And when technology advanced, zinc sulphate could be applied via drinking water systems which circulated around the farm.

Messy chore
However, for sheep farmers where prevention involved weekly drenching with zinc oxide, it was just not practical, which was good because it got them determined to find an alternative solution.

I well remember seeing the mess in many woolsheds, as old washing machines were being used to mix the powder and water. You would think the shed and the sheep yards had been whitewashed – which was in stark contrast the shepherds’ blue language over their weekly mustering and drenching chore. The stress on sheep, dogs and staff was too much.

Why did some sheep survive?
Some smart farmers noticed that there were individual sheep that survived whatever the season (based on the survival of the fittest), so Ruakura researchers picked this up and started a flock selected for high and low FE resistance along with a randomly selected control group, and it continued for many years.

This was possible as the toxin (sporidesmin) had been isolated from the fungus (Pythomyces chartarum) grown in the lab at Ruakura, so sheep could be dosed with it to measure their liver reaction. As this was a very nasty toxin, handling and dosing animals with it had to be done by veterinarians, or under their supervision.

FE resistance heritable
These selection flocks soon showed that FE resistance was heritable and quite strongly too with heritability around 45%. This was similar to wool production, so it allowed farmers to start selecting for it along with their other important production traits. And they did – with great enthusiasm and success, working closely with Ruakura staff.

Colin Southey
A major driving force in this was the late Colin Southey who was a Farm Adviser at MAF Pukekohe, along with former Farm Advisor Andy Dalton. In their Raglan coastal hill country area in the early 1970s, FE was killing off over 40% of flock replacements causing enormous economic loss to hill country farmers. Many farms were losing 1000 sheep every year, and the losses in their replacement hoggets were particularly devastating.

It was Colin who drove the FE testing from the Ruakura labs into woolsheds and sheep yards for vets to administer the toxin and measure the response in blood tests using the enzyme GGT (gammglutylthiamase) which had been developed for measuring liver damage in human alcoholics.

Colin was a great driving force to get groups of breeders working together to select for FE resistance, and share the genetic gain made between their own flocks before passing it on to commercial ram buyers.

Two-tooth rams tested
Farmers put up the best of their top two-tooth rams for testing, and only kept those that survived the increasing levels of toxin as the years went on. In theory, if the flock had been achieving overall genetic gain over time, the two-tooths were the best genetics so were the obvious age group to test.

It’s a pity that the test was so expensive, around $300/ram, as it prevented stud breeders testing females, and hence speeding up overall genetic gain in their flock to pass on to commercial buyers. Selection on the female side had to come through survival of the fittest.

Dose rates
Dose rates were based on weight, so when farmers started, this was 0.1-0.2mg of sporidesmin/kg of body weight. Today most Waikato sheep breeders have sheep that will now take 0.6 mg/kg. In today’s flocks even in severe years, they never see a clinical case of FE so the programme has been a massive success.

Disappointing uptake
But the disappointing feature to me was that after 40 years of hard work and investment, none of the Romney, Coopworth or Perendale breeders who put large amounts of time and money into their flocks, got rich selling their FE-resistant rams to committed commercial sheep farmers.

The main reason was farmer complacency – as FE was never severe every year. Farmers seemed to believe that like lightning, it never strikes twice in the same place. So after a bad year, panic many drive farmers to buy FE resistant rams, but it may not based on the 'lightning logic'. But if they did buy the progeny of tested rams from stud breeders as they didn’t see the impact for some years which may not be bad seasons, they concluded that nothing had worked.

Genetic change takes time
Commercial sheep farmers didn’t seem to understand that genetic change took time, especially as new genes were only entering the flock on the ram side. So it took many sheep generations (average 3 years) to see any dramatic change, and it needed a few bad FE seasons to show this.

Buying rams locally
The other frustration was that even after massive losses, too many sheep farmers were loathe to buy rams from their local area. There seemed to be something wired into farmers that made them assume that you had to travel well out of the district to get ‘good rams’!

These 'good rams' were inevitably massive animals, covered in wool and usually very fat, as they’d come from very good farming areas. Some had even been on ‘hard feed’ and regularly drenched before buyer inspection time. Inevitably, these rams came from areas where FE did not occur!

Buying replacement ewes
After a devastating season, farmers never bought replacement sheep in their own area – they always went well away south to sales, which was the very worst thing genetically that they could do, as this diluted any genetic gain made by resistant rams that they had been using.

Stock agents
Stock agents who still have a big effect on farmers' decisions
on where they buy their rams.


Stock agents had a major part to play in this misguided practice, and I battled with many of them over the years about their role in improving hill country sheep flocks in the Whatawhata Research Station (Raglan) area, where lambing percentages were the lowest in the country.

Agents always reckoned that rams from Raglan breeders were ‘too blardy small’, assuming size was a major indicator of genetic merit for sheep to survive and perform on hard hill country. They could never understand that most of a ram’s size was caused by the environment (feeding) and not genetics.

The visual look of a ram always took pride of place in ram selection by agents in those days and any records were a mystery that only held up the 'ram picking' job and delayed the time spent by the drinks cabinet in the front room of the house!

I always suspected there were Company deals going on to move surplus big fat rams from, the classical ram breeding areas (we called them ram alley) in theWairarapa and Manawatu up to the Waikato, as a sort of clearing house for their surplus.

Agents would take off with a car load of buyers at crack of dawn, pick the rams for the client, empty a whiskey bottle or two, and be home after the last pub closed on the way. It was great business as the rams didn’t live long, and the agents got regular business each season and the ram buyers had their ‘ram picking trip’ to look forward to as an annual feature!

I once met a very tired farm manager at 6pm, who had just been dropped off at a friends house where he’d left his car at 4am to be picked up by his agent. He was proud to tell me he’d been ‘to pick the rams’. I asked him where he had been, and he wasn’t sure – other than it was somewhere in the Manawatu and it had taken over 5 hours to get there. I then asked about selecting the rams and he said the agent had done this for his boss, and he just looked on to give them a final approval. I asked if the Sheeplan performance records had been used to pick the rams but he didn’t know what I was talking about. He had not seen any paper sheets around.

Dalton’s 13-pub rule for genetic gain
Once in a farmers’ meeting discussing this issue, I formulated a ‘natural law’ which said that if any sheep farmer wanted to be sure of getting genetic gain through his or her Stock agent, then they had to go past at least 13 pubs in the agent’s car, listening to all the agent’s wisdom and war stories, before genetic progress could be guaranteed from anything they bought! I sometimes still meet many farmers who can remember this – but nothing else I said!

Things have changed
But things have changed, and especially in the last five years, with this year seeing a total clearance of breeders’ rams selected for FE resistance. This is mainly due to increasing dry seasons (climate change or not) and the appearance of FE in new areas of the North Island.

What’s good for stud breeders selecting for resistance, is that seeing FE every year and enough losses to show on the bank balance, has made commercial farmers concentrate on finding a solution – which is through genetics and not their veterinarians. This has never been helped by veterinarians as they are not strong on genetics – and in any case genetics do not sell the farmer anything off their shelves.

Zinc boluses
Zinc oxide boluses for lambs showing the zinc inside
the wax protective cover


Veterinarians do sell zinc boluses for both sheep and cattle. When Ruakura scientists recognised the difficulty of regularly drenching sheep with zinc oxide, they developed these to stay in the rumen and be effective for a month. This delivers a slow rate of zinc as the exposed end of the bolus dissolves.

The bolus is used by farmers who see it, and the costs and work involved in inserting it, as a basic protection. The problem is that it does not provide enough zinc when spores rise rapidly and dangers of toxicity are high. The sheep in the picture at the top of this post were all given a bolus which clearly was not enough zinc to protect them from the 'natural challenge' they got on the farm.

Ramguard
All the past years of research at The Ruakura Agricultural Research Centre has been built into a programme called ‘Ramguard Facial Eczema Tolerance Testing Service’. Here sheep breeders can get information on how to test for FE tolerance and how to build this information into an overall breeding programme. Google ‘Ramguard’ for details.

Tolerance and resistance
I have been involved in many academic arguments about which is the correct term to use. I don’t really think it’s important – I use resistance.

Breeders need thanks
The sheep industry should be grateful to these Waikato breeders of FE-resistant sheep who never gave up, and were prepared to invest in on-farm R & D to deal to a major animal scourge. They have also proved conclusively that to farm sustainably in today’s world, genetics will have a better long-term outcome than chemotherapy.

Further reading
John D.J. Scott (1989). Ruakura - 50 Years of Research and Recreation.
Facial Eczema. Page 29. Chapter by John Scott and Archie Campbell
ISBN 0-477-08021-9.

May 12, 2009

Facial Eczema (FE). Farmer Information Notes. Introduction

FACIAL ECZEMA NOTES

By Dr Clive Dalton

Original 1991 information written by Dr Barry Smith and Dr Neale Towers, Ruakura Agricultural Research Station, Hamilton, New Zealand.




BACKGROUND TO BLOG ON FE (2009)

In 1991 MAF’s Information Services Division produced technical leaflets called AgLinks, and I was a contributor to those as well as a technical editor getting other qualified people to write them. There were four on Facial Eczema, but they were rather heavy going I thought, and saw the need for more basic material as one-pagers in big print, so farmers need only use the relevant bits. The idea was timely, as the whole AgLink database died around 1980 when MAF's new 'commercial' managers decided we had to charge for information.

FE didn’t die with the AgLinks, so I got the two Ruakura top scientists, Dr Barry Smith and Dr Neale Towers, to write these “FE Notes” which I edited, and we mailed them out to farm advisers, telling them to photocopy the appropriate bits and give them away. We also mailed them direct to farmers on request at no charge, and told farmers and advisers to contact Barry or Neale directly for expert advice.

Smith and Towers had spent their careers on FE research at Ruakura as members of the thriving "Mycotoxic Diseases Research Group". It was closed down by the SOE AgResearch, that took over agricultural research in New Zealand.

These FE Notes disappeared along with MAF's variours divisons, but by a stroke of good luck, Neale Towers still had a copy which I have put on this Blog.

Warning: Some things have changed since 1991 so you'll have to take account of these as I have not updated the words. The only thing I have changed is to replace "contact MAF" with "contact your veterinarian'". The chemicals and products mentioned may now be out of date, so check with your veterinarian what is current. Prices are clearly out of date. Approval of products is now under the Animal Medicines and Veterinary Medicines (ACVM) Act and must also be approved by New Zealand Food Safety. Ask your veterinarian for the latest information on approved products. It is against the law to use an animal remedy that does not have a license or an approval of some sort, and your vet will tell you what happens when you use drugs 'off label'.

In 1991 we didn't remind farmers that horses don't get FE and this question comes up from time to time. Also at that time Camelids (Llamas and Alpacas) were not common on farms and we now know that they can get FE, so check with your veterinarian about prevention measures for them and treatment of sick animals. Zinc boluses for sheep and beef cattle were not invented in 1991 and counting spores in faeces instead of pasture is a recent development.

The titles of the series is as follows.
1. Facial Eczema: Cause and symptoms.
2. Facial Eczema: Fungicides in FE control.
3. Facial Eczema: (Dairy Cattle). Management.
4. Facial Eczema: Zinc oxide. General dosing information.
5. Facial Eczema: (Dairy Cattle). Zinc oxide. Long-term dosing.
6. Facial Eczema: (Dairy Cattle). Zinc oxide. Crisis dosing.
7. Facial Eczema: (Dairy Cattle). Zinc oxide. Dosing with motor-driven systems.
8. Facial Eczema: Zinc oxide. Prevention by pasture spraying.
9. Facial Eczema: (Sheep): Zinc oxide. Long-term dosing.
10. Facial Eczema: (Dairy cattle). Zinc sulphate. In drinking water.
11. Facial Eczema: (Dairy cattle). Zinc sulphate. Using in-line dispenser.
12. Facial Eczema: (Dairy cattle). Zinc sulphate. Direct addition to supply tank.
13. Facial Eczema: (Dairy cattle). Zinc sulphate. Direct addition to trough.
14.Facial Eczema: (Dairy cattle). Zinc sulphate. Using in-trough dispensers.
15. Facial Eczema: (Sheep & beef cattle). Grazing management.
16. Facial Eczema: (Goats). Management.
17. Facial Eczema: (Deer). Management.
18. Facial Eczema: (Sheep). Mangement. Minimising losses after outbreaks.
19. Facial Eczema: (Sheep). Breeding. Buying FE resistant rams.
20. Facial Eczema: (Sheep). Breeding. Breeding resistant rams.

How to find each of the above items
Copy and paste the title from the list above - and enter it into the Google search box at the top left hand side of the blog front page.

Spring Eczema
This is a condition which veterinarians say is not Facial Eczema as it occurs in spring, when FE is an autumn disease. The cause of Spring Eczema is not know, but speculation is that 'it's something in the feed".  It certainly looks like classical FE and it pays to treat it as such.


 
Picture of animal with a healed eczema scab on white area of its back


Disclaimer
This material is provided in good faith for information purposes only, and the author does not accept any liability to any person for actions taken as a result of the information or advice (or the use of such information or advice) provided in these pages.

Facial Eczema (FE). Farmer Information. Part 1. Cause & symptoms.

Agriculture, animal husbandry, Facial Eczema, causes, symptoms, cattle, sheep, deer, goats

By Dr Clive Dalton

Original 1991 information written by Dr Barry Smith and Dr Neale Towers, Ruakura Agricultural Research Station, Hamilton, New Zealand.


Part 1. Cause and symptoms.
Facial eczema (FE) is a disease of sheep, cattle, deer and goats, which causes death and lowered production from liver injury. During periods of warm humid weather between January and April, the pasture fungus Pithomyces chartarum multiplies and produces spores which contain the toxin, sporidesmin.

Spores are easy to identify as they look like brown hand grenades.  
If they look black, they are old and less toxic.
Sporidesmin causes injury to the liver, the bile ducts become thickened and may be completely blocked. The damaged liver then cannot rid the body of wastes and a breakdown product of chlorophyll accumulates in the tissues and causes sensitivity to sunlight. Sunlight causes immediate and severe skin inflammation to exposed parts of the body.

 Damaged liver


FE can be so severe and stressing that it causes death. Animals can survive and recover from the disease, but the effects of the acute disease on growth, body weight, wool and milk production can be dramatic. Even if the liver damage is insufficient to cause photosensitisation, there can still be "sub-clinical" effects on the production of meat, wool and milk.

In any FE outbreak, many animals with liver damage show no clinical signs - but they suffer from sub-clinical FE. The appearance of the clinical condition results from spore consumption some 10-20 days earlier and the toxic spore level may have taken one to several weeks to develop.

Toxic conditions
For rapid growth and spore formation, the fungus needs warm, moist conditions and these are frequently supplied by the flows of tropical air from the north and east common during the autumn. Humidity is normally very high and 4-5 mm of rain or even heavy dews, in conjunction with 2-4 nights when grass minimum temperatures remain above 12-13°C, are sufficient to initiate rapid increases in spore numbers.

Spore counts rise even more rapidly when higher grass minimum temperatures (1 5-1 6°C) are associated with high humidities and/or light rain. Generally it takes two or three such "danger" periods before spore numbers reach dangerous levels, each spore rise providing the base for the next increase in spore numbers.

However, prolonged periods of warm, humid weather early in the season can accelerate the onset of toxic pastures. There is no such thing as an unqualified "dangerous spore level".
  • The toxicity of a pasture at any one time depends on several factors: The spore count.
  • The age of spores in the pasture (old spores are less toxic).
  • The grazing intensity and level of the pasture being consumed. (Animals grazing down to the base of the pasture are at most risk.)
  • Prior exposure of animals to toxic spores (makes them more susceptible).
  • The susceptibility of different breeds and species.
  • The length of time for which the high spore level is present and consumed.
Depending on the above factors, the level of spores on pasture may prove to be toxic anywhere above 40,000 spores/gram of grass (wash count), and long-term ingestion of low levels of spores may also lead to FE. Spore numbers can vary within and between paddocks depending on the topography, aspect, altitude and previous management practices.

Clinical signs
Species vary in their susceptibility to FE. Fallow deer and sheep are most susceptible, followed by dairy cattle, beef cattle and red deer, then most resistant are goats. Breeds vary within species, as do flocks and herds within breeds.

Sheep
The earliest signs of FE are increased restlessness, head shaking, scratching, rubbing of the head and shade-seeking behaviour. The exposed areas of the skin about the face and ears become swollen and thickened. The ears will droop. Later there is exuded serum and scab formation. This may be worsened by damage to the skin by the animals rubbing. Other areas affected are the vulva and the coronet above the hooves. Severely affected animals show jaundice.

Cattle
The first sign of FE in dairy cattle is a marked drop in milk production occurring soon after the intake of toxic spores and this occurs again after the onset of clinical FE. The animal will be restless at milking time, seek shade, and lick its udder. The clinical signs of FE are the thickening and peeling of exposed unpigmented or thin skin. Areas most affected are the white areas, the escutcheon and inside of hind legs, the udder and teats, and the coronets. The tip of the tongue is sometimes affected.

Deer
Deer appear to be more disturbed by the irritation of photosensitisation. Affected deer are more restless and irritable and actively seek shade. They frequently lick their muzzles and lips and the tongue tip becomes ulcerated. The lips and muzzle and areas about the eyes become affected and temporary blindness may develop. Deterioration rate and mortality appear to be higher in deer. Fallow deer are more susceptible than other species.

Goats
Goats develop crusty lesions about their eyes and lips and the ears may become thickened. Occasionally little more than a sunken weepy eyed appearance is seen. They will seek shade.

Disclaimer
This material is provided in good faith for information purposes only, and the author does not accept any liability to any person for actions taken as a result of the information or advice (or the use of such information or advice) provided in these pages.

Facial Eczema (FE). Farmer Information. Part 2. Fungicides in FE control.

Agriculture, Farming, animal husbandry, animal health, animal diseases, Facial Eczema, spraying, prevention, fungicides.

By Dr Clive Dalton

Original 1991 information written by Dr Barry Smith and Dr Neale Towers, Ruakura Agricultural Research Station, Hamilton, New Zealand.



Through the microscope, spores of Pithomyces chartarum look like brown hand grenades among the other debris on the slide.
Part 2. Fungicides in FE control.


Background
  • Spraying with fungicides in late January or early February reduces the growth of the FE fungus in the pasture base and lowers the numbers of spores formed when weather conditions are dangerous.
  • Pastures sprayed early remain safe for 4-6 weeks.
  • Fungicides reduce the number of toxic spores produced during a danger period by 55-65 percent. They do not completely eliminate spore production.
  • To achieve best control, apply fungicides before spore numbers rise.
  • Except in years when conditions are extremely dangerous properly applied fungicides should prevent FE. Under extremely dangerous conditions fungicides will give partial protection markedly reducing the severity and costs of the outbreak.
Spraying Strategy
Farmers can spray all or only part of their farms. Individual management options, likelihood of severe outbreaks, economics and the terrain will decide strategy.

1. Spraying total grazing area
  • Requires suitable farm contour for ground or aerial application to total area. This method is used on dairy or deer farms where stock managers want unrestricted access to all available grazing on their property.
  • This is a relatively high cost but very effective option suited to high producing areas or to protect high value animals.
  • Monitor pastures occasionally to check whether they are still safe.
  • Respray after 5-6 weeks until all danger of FE has passed.
2. Spraying part of grazing area
  • Part of the farm (perhaps one third) is sprayed to provide an area of safe pasture for grazing during dangerous conditions.
  • When spore counts are high, or danger warnings are issued, stock are moved onto the sprayed pasture.
  • It may then be necessary to spray a further area to provide safe pasture for the animals after the finish of the original sprayed pasture.
  • This method minimises the initial cost of spraying but requires ongoing monitoring of the pastures the animals are to graze to ensure that it is safe.
  • Decisions to spray additional pasture should be made early to ensure the spray is applied before dangerously high spore counts are established.
Fungicide sprays currently recommended for controlling FE spores are:
  • Benomyl (Benlate)
  • Thiophanate methyl (Topsin M4A).
DO NOT use orchard type fungicides such as Mancozebs (e.g. Dithane M45). They are excellent on fruit and vegetables but totally ineffective for controlling pasture (FE causing) fungus.

Spraying Techniques
  • Complete spray cover is essential. Include stock races, fence lines and under hedges and shelter belts.
  • Use clean water and clean equipment.
  • Boom spray only. Rosette type applicators are not sufficiently accurate.
  • Spray at the rate of 220 litres water/hectare. Avoid fluctuations of vehicle speed.
  • Fungicide application rates and costs:


  • Spray in settled weather. Rain in excess of 25 mm in a 24 hour period within 3 days of spraying will reduce the efficacy of the fungicide and make respraying necessary.
  • Respray pasture after this time, or respray if additional safe pasture is required.
  • Allow 5 days for mid-season spraying for pastures to become safe; only graze earlier in emergency.
  • Do not spray pasture with spore counts over 200,000. The fungicide will be ineffective and the pasture will remain dangerous to stock.
Disclaimer
This material is provided in good faith for information purposes only, and the author does not accept any liability to any person for actions taken as a result of the information or advice (or the use of such information or advice) provided in these pages.

Facial Eczema (FE). Farmer Information. Part 3. (Dairy Cattle). Management.

Agriculture, farming, animal husbandry, animal heath, disease, Facial Eczema, Dairy cattle, management, advice, recommendations


By Dr Clive Dalton

Original 1991 information written by Dr Barry Smith and Dr Neale Towers, Ruakura Agricultural Research Station, Hamilton, New Zealand.
 
3. (Dairy Cattle). Management.
  • Make early preparations - in December or early January.
  •  Learn about spore counting - contact your veterinarian.
  • Find out which are your worst paddocks (by spore counting) and avoid grazing them during danger periods.
  • Never make stock graze into the base level of pastures. The fungus grows on the litter at the base of the pasture and the spores are concentrated there.
  • Choose a prevention option from one of the following three:
  •  (1). Spray pasture with fungicide. Check that spray unit is properly calibrated and purchase fungicide early.
  • (2). Use a suitable zinc prevention method. If you have a suitable water reticulation system, add zinc sulphate. Otherwise dose with zinc oxide or spray zinc oxide on to pasture.
  • (3). Provide supplementary feed (crops, fodder, hay or silage). Use to reduce grazing pressure on toxic pasture.
  • Have a concentrated calving and calve early so that you have at least 80% of annual production in the six months to the end of January.
  • Get rid of all surplus stock early before spore counts become high. This allows you to reduce grazing pressure for remaining stock. If things get worse dry off the herd.  This will immediately cut pressure on feed by half. It will also cut your income so it's an important decision.
  • If replacement heifers are grazed off the farm make sure that the manager is taking adequate measures to protect them against FE.
  • Care for affected stock by one of the following options:
  • (1). Dry off milking cows.
  • (2). Confine in shaded area, barn etc.
  •  (3).Treat infected skin lesions.
  • (4). Provide access to water and quality feed. Cattle with clinical FE will prefer to graze at night or in overcast conditions.
Disclaimer
This material is provided in good faith for information purposes only, and the authors do not accept any liability to any person for actions taken as a result of the information or advice (or the use of such information or advice) provided in these pages.

Facial Eczema (FE). Part 5. Farm Information.(Dairy Cattle). Zinc oxide. Long-term dosing.

Agriculture, Farming, animal husbandry, animal health, disease, Facial Eczema, advice on prevention, recommendations, zinc, zinc oxide, long-term dosing, recipes.

By Dr Clive Dalton

Original 1991 information written by Dr Barry Smith and Dr Neale Towers, Ruakura Agricultural Research Station, Hamilton, New Zealand.


5. Facial Eczema: (Dairy Cattle). Zinc oxide. Long-term dosing.
  • Milking cattle are best dosed daily, this gives best protection and, once the cows are trained, causes less disruption in the shed.
  • Milking cattle can be protected by dosing at 2 or 3 day intervals. Do not dose at greater than 3-day intervals as the high zinc doses will cause milk fever in a small proportion of the cows.
  • Dry cattle can be dosed twice weekly, or at weekly or fortnightly intervals.
  • Dose rates need to be increased to account for less efficient protection and the length of interval between doses if not dosed daily.
  • Zinc oxide dosing can be expected to markedly reduce, but not totally prevent, FE outbreaks.
  • Daily dosing should reduce the number of animals affected and the severity of the damage to the livers of affected animals by 80-90%.
  • Twice-weekly (lactating) and weekly dosing (dry stock) by 70-80%.
  • A more stable and concentrated drench can be made by including either a commercial stabiliser such as CoZinc (Coast Biologicals Ltd) or Maximix (Bell-Booth Ltd), or a liquid "farm" strength seaweed fertiliser such as Maxicrop (Bell-Booth Ltd), Green Label Response (Coast Biologicals Ltd) or Sea Magic (Yates Ltd).
Remember: Not all liquid fertilisers are seaweed based.
  • Stabilisers have two advantages:
  • (1). They increase the ease of mixing and drenching.
  • (2). They allow the mixing of more concentrated drenches and therefore use of smaller drench volumes.
  • Make sure you use the right dose rate for the type of drench mixed.
Note: Proprietary mixes such as Cozinc (Coast Biologicals Ltd), Maximix (Bell-Booth Ltd) and Nu Zinc (Nufarm Ltd) should be mixed and used as recommended on the product label.

Recipes
Unstabilised drench
  • Mix 1 kg zinc oxide with 2.5 litres of water.
  • Sprinkle powder on water and leave to wet.
  • Stir until smooth and lump free.
  • If too stiff to flow through drench gun, add a little more water.
  • If too thin to stay in suspension, stir in a little more zinc oxide powder.
  • This produces about 2.7 litres of drench.
  • Daily dosing: 7 ml/100 kg liveweight.
  • 3-day, weekly: 10 ml/100 kg liveweight x No. of days between drenches
Stabilised drench
  • Mix 1 kg zinc oxide powder with 1 litre of water and 200 ml of "stabiliser".
  • Mix the stabiliser and water first.
  • Sprinkle powder on the water and let settle and wet.
  • Stir to a smooth creamy paste.
  • Daily dosing: 3.6 ml/100 kg liveweight.
  • 3-day-weekly: 5ml/100 kg liveweight x No. of days between drenches.




Disclaimer
This material is provided in good faith for information purposes only, and the author does not accept any liability to any person for actions taken as a result of the information or advice (or the use of such information or advice) provided in these pages.

Facial Eczema (FE). Farm Information. Part 4.Zinc oxide. General dosing information.

Agriculture, farming, animal husbandry, animal health, disease, Facial Eczema, prevention, zinc oxide, general dosing information, zinc, toxicity, copper, selenium

 By Dr Clive Dalton

Original 1991 information written by Dr Barry Smith and Dr Neale Towers, Ruakura Agricultural Research Station, Hamilton, New Zealand.


4. FACIAL ECZEMA:  Zinc oxide. General dosing information.  

When to Start
  •  Have supplies of Zinc Oxide and the equipment needed ready well before the FE season starts. Supplies can be difficult to buy during an FE outbreak.
  •  Zinc dosing should begin as soon as the weather conditions (warm, humid, grass minimum temperature more than 13"C, heavy dew or 3-4 mm rain) favour spore growth and/or at the first signs that spore counts are beginning to rise. Don't wait until dangerous conditions arise, or until clinical cases are seen. 
  • The spore rises precede clinical symptoms by some 10-1 4 days, and to be effective zinc must be dosed before or at the time the animals graze toxic pasture. 
  • Farmers regularly monitoring spore counts early in the season could delay starting dosing until counts begin to rise (don't wait until they reach danger level). It usually takes more than a week for the earliest spore rise of a season to reach danger levels, so starting dosing immediately spore rises begin should provide adequate protection.
  • On problem farms in particular begin dosing in mid-January and continue throughout the autumn. 
  • Stock should not be exposed to zinc unnecessarily and excessively prolonged zinc dosing lowers the safety margin.

How to Start
  • Begin dosing at long-term dose rates unless dangerous conditions already exist.
  •  If conditions become dangerous during the first week of dosing increase the dose rate to "crisis" levels. Keep dose rates at this level for two weeks then reduce to long-term dose rates.
When to Stop
  • Continue dosing through the expected FE season.
  •  Towards the end of the FE season dosing can stop when spore counts fall to low levels and weather conditions are dry and cool. But watch the weather and start dosing if conditions favour spore growth again.
  • After long-term zinc dosing ceases, protection will carry over for several days.
  • After prolonged zinc dosing, protection will be quickly re-established once zinc administration begins again.
Zinc Toxicity
  • Overdosing with zinc is toxic. Take care calculating dose rates, weighing zinc and mixing drenches. Check drench guns for accuracy.
  •  There is a 3-fold safety margin for dosing zinc over 60 days, i.e. if three times the recommended rate is given it will cause damage to the pancreas.
  • The safety margin for dosing for longer periods is progressively reduced. Hence the need to use the correct dose rates, and avoiding unnecessary dosing for long periods.
  • Pancreatic injury must be severe before effects on animal health are noted. The pancreas will recover when zinc dosing ceases.
  • Administering zinc oxide drenches in large amounts as may occur with weekly or fortnightly dosing interferes with calcium metabolism (and may cause milk fever) and is not recommended for lactating stock.
  • Because elevations of zinc occur in liver and kidney (not meat) a withholding period of 1 week should be allowed before animals are slaughtered.

Copper and Selenium
  • Long-term zinc dosing may interfere with copper and selenium metabolism, although it has not yet been shown to induce copper or selenium deficiency.
  •  In areas where these minerals are deficient supplement the animals with copper and selenium immediately after zinc administration ceases.
  • Don't give copper supplements during the FE season unless clinical deficiencies exist. If copper supplements are required use an injectable preparation.

Purity of Zinc Compounds
  • Ask the supplier if the zinc oxide meets the Animal Remedies Board's specifications.

General
A volumetric measure of the zinc oxide is sufficient when mixing. Weigh out the zinc oxide needed to dose all animals, smooth the surface and mark the surface height on the container. An independent check of calculations should be made and professional advice sought if there is any doubt about the methods.


Disclaimer
This material is provided in good faith for information purposes only, and the author does not accept any liability to any person for actions taken as a result of the information or advice (or the use of such information or advice) provided in these pages.

Facial Eczema (FE). Farmer Information. Part 6. (Dairy Cattle). Zinc oxide. Crisis dosing.

Agriculture, farming, animal husbandry, animal health, disease, Facial Eczema, dairy cattle, dosing in crisis, zinc, dose rates

 By Dr Clive Dalton
 

Original 1991 information written by Dr Barry Smith and Dr Neale Towers, Ruakura Agricultural Research Station, Hamilton, New Zealand.
 

6. FACIAL ECZEMA: (Dairy Cattle). Zinc oxide. Crisis dosing.
  • Where the danger of FE does not normally warrant routine zinc oxide dosing, cattle can be protected by dosing during danger periods only, i.e. "Crisis dosing".
  •  Crisis dosing gives less protection than long-term routine dosing and therefore requires higher dose rates to give adequate protection.
  •  Daily dosing during danger periods will reduce the number of animals affected and the severity of the liver damage in affected animals by about 60%.
  • Crisis dosing is best restricted to daily or at most twice weekly dosing. 
  • Zinc oxide drenches can be prepared with or without a seaweed based "stabiliser".
  •  Stabilisers have two advantages:
  • (1). They increase the ease of mixing and drenching.
  •  (2). They allow the mixing of more concentrated drenches and therefore use of smaller drench volumes.
Unstabilised drench
Recipe
  • Mix 1 kg zinc oxide with 2.5 litres of water.
  •  Sprinkle powder on water and leave to wet.
  •  Stir until smooth and lump free.
  •  If too stiff to flow through drench gun, add a little more water.
  •  If too thin to stay in suspension, stir in a little more zinc oxide powder.
  • This produces about 2.7 litres of drench.
Stabilised drench
Recipe
  • Mix 1 kg zinc oxide powder with 1 litre of water and 200 ml of "stabiliser".
  •  Mix the stabiliser and water first.
  •  Sprinkle powder on the water and let settle and wet.
  •  Stir to a smooth creamy paste.
  •  This produces about 1.4 litres of drench.
Use liquid "farm" strength seaweed fertilisers as stabilisers such as Maxicrop
(Bell-Booth Ltd), Sea Magic (Yates Ltd) and Green Label Response (Coast
Biologicals Ltd).

Dose Rates
  • Unstabilised drenches: 10 ml/100 kg liveweight.
  • Stabilised drenches: 5 ml/100 kg liveweight

Approximate daily dose volumes - Crisis dosing



  • If dosing at 2- or 3-day intervals, multiply the daily dose rate by the number of days between doses.
Note: Proprietary mixes such as Cozinc (Coast Biologicals Ltd), Maximix  (Bell-Booth Ltd) and
 Nu Zinc (Nufarm Ltd) should be mixed and used as recommended on the product label.

Some motor-driven drenching systems cannot be adjusted to the recommended dose
volumes. Therefore the drench mixture must be adjusted so that the correct amount of
zinc oxide is given.

Disclaimer
This material is provided in good faith for information purposes only, and the author does not accept any liability to any person for actions taken as a result of the information or advice (or the use of such information or advice) provided in these pages.

Facial Eczema (FE). Farmer Information. Part 9. (Sheep). Zinc oxide. Long-term dosing.

Agriculture, farming, animal husbandry, animal health, disease, Facial Eczema, preventoin, zinc, zinc oxide, dosing, long-term dosing, recipes.

By Dr Clive Dalton

Original 1991 information written by Dr Barry Smith and Dr Neale Towers, Ruakura Agricultural Research Station, Hamilton, New Zealand.



9. Facial Eczema: (Sheep). Zinc oxide. Long-term dosing.
  • Sheep should be dosed regularly with zinc oxide throughout late summer and autumn period.
  • Zinc dosing should start at least 2 weeks before dangerous conditions normally occur. In most districts this means dosing should start in early to mid January.
  • Dosing should continue until cooler winter weather conditions occur.
  • Protection can be obtained buy dosing twice weekly, or at weekly or fortnightly intervals. However, at the longer dosing intervals lower levesl of protection can be expected.
  • Weekly dosing should reduce liver damage by 60-70%.
  • Dosing at 2-week intervals will give less protection and reduce liver damage by about half if carried out regularly during the FE season.
  • If dosing at 2-week intervals, the next zinc oxide dose should be brought forward if a danger period occurs in the last half of the interval.
  • Dosing at 2-week intervals has on occasion been associated with salmonellosis outbreaks. Where this has been a problem, a maximum dosing interval of 1 week is recommended.
  • Zinc oxide drenches can be prepared with or without a seaweed “stabliser”.

  • Stablisers have two advantages:
  • (1). They increase the ease of mixing and drenching.
  • (2). They allow the mixing of more concentrated drenches and therefore use smaller drench volumes.
  • Recipes and dose rates of both types of drenhches are provided below. Make sure you use the right dose rate for the type of drench mixed.
Note: Proprietory mixes such as Cozinc (Coastal Biologicals Ltd), Maximix (Bell-Booth Ltd) and Nu Zinc (Nufarm Ltd) should be mixed and used as recommended on the product label.

Unstabilised drench

Recipe
  • Mix 1 kg zinc oxide with 2.5 litres of water.
  • Sprinkle powder on water and leave to wet.
  • Stir until smooth and lump free.
  • If too stiff to flow through drench gun, add a little more water.
  • If too thin to stay in suspension, stir in a little more zinc oxide powder
  • This produces about 2.7 litres of drench.
Stabilised drench
A more stable and concentrated drench can be made by including either a commercial stabiliser such as CoZinc (Coast Biologicals) or Maximix (Bell-Booth Ltd), or a" farm" strength liquid seaweed fertiliser such as Maxicrop (Bell-Booth Ltd), Green Label Response (Coast Biologicals Ltd), Sea Magic (Yates Ltd).

Recipe
  • Mix 1 kg zinc oxide with 1 litre of water and 200 ml of "stabiliser".
  • Mix the stabiliser and water first.
  • Sprinkle powder on the water and let settle and wet.
  • Stir to a smooth creamy paste.
  • This produces about 1.4 litres of drench.

Dose rates:
  • Unstabilised - 1 ml/10 kg liveweight x no. of days.
  • Stabilised - 0.5 ml/10 kg liveweight x no of days.

Approximate dose volumes:

Footnote 2009: Zinc boluses are now available. Contact your veterinarian for information.

Disclaimer
This material is provided in good faith for information purposes only, and the author does not accept any liability to any person for actions taken as a result of the information or advice (or the use of such information or advice) provided in these pages.

Facial Eczema (FE). Farmer Information. Part 7. Zinc Oxide. Motor-driven Drenching Systems

Agriculture, farming, animal husbandry, animal health, disease, Facial Eczema, advice, recommendations, zinc, zinc oxide, motor driven drenching systems, methods

By Dr Clive Dalton

Original 1991 information written by Dr Barry Smith and Dr Neale Towers, Ruakura Agricultural Research Station, Hamilton, New Zealand.

 Part 7. Facial Eczema. Zinc Oxide. Motor-driven drenching systems

 Some motor-driven drenching systems cannot be adjusted to the recommended dose volumes. Therefore the drench mixture must be adjusted so that the correct amount of zinc oxide is given.


Method
-
Establish the drench volume/cow.
  • Deliver a set number of shots into a measuring jug.
  • Record the total volume.
  • Divide the total volume by the number of shots to get the shot volume.
  • e.g. 10 shots equals 550 ml
  • Shot volume = 550 +- 10 = 55 ml
  • Repeat at least once to confirm the result.
Determine the correct zinc oxide dose per cow from the table below.



Note. These rates give the same zinc dose as the other zinc drenches.
These rates are higher than recommended in AgLink FPP 496.
  • Subtract 3 ml from drench shot volume to compensate for the volume of the zinc oxide, e.g. 55 ml - 3 = 52 ml.
  •  Multiply volume and the zinc oxide dose rate by the number of cows, e.g. 100 cows x (10 g zinc oxide + 52 ml water) = 1 kg zinc oxide + 5.2 litres water (1 kg + 5 litres rounded off).
  • Multiply the daily mix by the number of days, e.g. for 20 days = 20 kg zinc oxide + 100 litres water.
  • Most farmers would prepare a bulk mix of a 20 kg bag of zinc oxide.
Note: In mid-season, check your zinc supplies and your arithmetic to make sure you
have not been overdosing.
  • e.g. 100 cows (J x F) @ 10 g/day for 50 days = 100 x 10 g x 50 days = 50 000 g (50 kg).
  •  Have you used more or less than 50 kg zinc oxide so far?
Disclaimer
This material is provided in good faith for information purposes only, and the author does not accept any liability to any person for actions taken as a result of the information or advice (or the use of such information or advice) provided in these pages.

Facial Eczema (FE). Farmer Information. Part 8. Zinc oxide. Prevention by pasture spraying.

Agriculture, farming, animal husbandry, animal health, disease, Facial Eczema, prevention, pasture spraying, zinc oxide.

By Dr Clive Dalton

Original 1991 information written by Dr Barry Smith and Dr Neale Towers, Ruakura Agricultural Research Station, Hamilton, New Zealand.

8. FACIAL ECZEMA: Zinc oxide. Prevention by pasture spraying.
  • Spraying zinc oxide onto pasture before it is grazed provides a method of dosing large numbers of animals with a relatively low labour input.
  •  The method requires an area of sprayable land with sufficient pasture to provide grazing for a 12 or 24 h period.
  • The method works best when the grazing area is small and t he pasture is moderately long so that the percentage utilisation of the pasture is high.
  • A high pasture utilisation is needed to ensure that most of the zinc oxide is actually eaten by the grazing animals.
  • Dry stock can be protected by spraying pasture either once or twice a week.  Milking cows are best protected by spraying pasture daily - but note that the need to restrict grazing to maximise zinc intakes will affect production.
  • Milking cows could be protected by grazing sprayed pasture at 3-4 day intervals, but should not be given weekly doses of zinc oxide as this is likely to interfere with calcium metabolism and cause milk fever.
  • The method is not suitable for calves, which require lax grazing for good liveweight gains.
  • The major advantage with zinc oxide spraying is that it can give immediate protection when conditions are dangerous. Spraying fungicides may be more convenient and not much more costly.
Procedure
  • Spray or dust a restricted area sufficient for 12 or 24 hours hard grazing.
  • Graze animals at stocking rates ensuring maximum pasture utilisation. Confine animals to the sprayed area.
  • Choose application rates to match the dosing interval (daily, twice weekly, weekly) and the estimated pasture utilisation expected (see tables below).
  • Any spraying system (boom or rose) with a high return flow through the bypass valve is adequate for applying zinc oxide. The high return flow is required to keep the zinc oxide in suspension; with an inadequate flow there is a danger of the zinc oxide settling and blocking inlets etc.
  • Continue spraying the area until all mixture is applied. Use largest possible nozzles and spray flow rates.
Mixing
  • If a high-pressure water supply (yard washing system) is available pour the dry zinc oxide into the spray tank (place a piece of timber over the pump inlet first to prevent blocking) and use the high pressure water jet to disperse the powder while filling the tank.
  •  Alternatively, mix 5 kg lots into a slurry by hand and add to partly filled spray tank. It is easiest if the dry powder is poured onto water in bucket and left to settle before stirring. Don't pour water onto the powder.
Amount of Zinc Oxide to Use
  • Dose rates should be adjusted to compensate for changes in pasture utilisation as this controls the proportion of the zinc oxide applied that is actually eaten.
  •  Most of the zinc oxide will be on the upper parts of the sward. Zinc oxide ingestion is about 20 percent higher than the pasture utilisation.
  • On shorter autumn pastures utilisation rates of about 30-35 percent can be expected.
  • Choose the dose rate that best matches your estimates of pasture utilisation and average liveweight for your herd from the table below.
  • Multiply the daily dose rates by the number of animals to be treated.
Example:
  • For a 160 cow F x J herd with average weight of 400 kg eating about a third of the grass' offered.
  •  Daily dose rate = 20 g.
  • Total zinc oxide required 20 x 160 = 3200 g = 3.2 kg
 (Note: Not recommended for calves).
  • Daily spraying should have minimal effect on pasture palatability although cattle may show some initial reluctance to graze.
  •  Milking cattle can be protected by grazing zinc-oxide-sprayed pasture at 2 to 4 day intervals, but the dose rates need to be increased to compensate for the less effective protection.
  • If dosing at 2-, 3- or 4-day intervals multiply the daily dose rates by 2.5, 4 or 5.5.
  •  Other classes of stock can be protected by grazing pastures sprayed with zinc oxide once a week. This is not recommended for milking cows.
  • Cattle and sheep grazing pastures sprayed once weekly, may show reluctance to graze the pasture. It may be necessary to confine them to the sprayed area for more than 24 hours - check final pasture utilisation and adjust spray rates to match.
  • The table below shows the amount of zinc oxide to use for other classes of stock and various levels of pasture use.
  • If the pasture utilisation rate is not known assume a 30% rate.


Disclaimer
This material is provided in good faith for information purposes only, and the author does not accept any liability to any person for actions taken as a result of the information or advice (or the use of such information or advice) provided in these pages.

Facial Eczema (FE). Farmer Information. Part 10. (Dairy cattle). Zinc sulphate. In drinking water.

Agriculture, farming, animal husbandry, animal health, disease, Facial Eczema, prevention, zinc, zinc sulphate, administered in drinking water, zinc toxicity, copper and selenium.
By Dr Clive Dalton

Original 1991 information written by Dr Barry Smith and Dr Neale Towers, Ruakura Agricultural Research Station, Hamilton, New Zealand.


10. Facial Eczema: (Dairy cattle). Zinc sulphate.  In drinking water. 

Administering zinc sulphate via the drinking water is a very effective way of preventing FE in dairy cattle. There are four main methods of adding zinc sulphate to the drinking water of cattle.
  • Using an in-line dispenser to add a concentrated solution of zinc sulphate into the water reticulation system.
  •  Adding zinc sulphate to a large tank (e.g. 22,000 litres, or 5,000 gals) which supplies the water reticulation system.
These are the preferred methods where the stock drinking water can be isolated from other uses of water on the farm.
  • Floating trough dispensers - large numbers of animals can be protected but there is less control of concentration than the other methods and the troughs may require twice-daily attendance.
  •  Direct addition to the water trough - this will only cope with very small numbers of animals.
Note: The addition of zinc sulphate to the water supply is only suitable to long-term routine dosing - it is not suited to "crisis" dosing during danger periods.

Water Reticulation
  • It is essential that zinc-medicated water is reticulated only to the livestock.
  •  Household water supplies and dairy shed water must be kept separate.
  •  Non-return valves may be necessary to avoid siphoning or back-flow problems, and water pressure and flow rates should be within the capacity of the diluting equipment being used.
Alternative Water
  • Except in the first day or two, cattle will not refuse zinc in drinking water at the recommended rates. However, they are will prefer un-medicated water to zinc treated water if given the choice.
  •  Make sure that livestock do not have access to alternative fresh water during the period that zinc is being added for FE control.
When to Start
  • Have supplies of ZINC SULPHATE and the equipment needed ready well before the FE season starts.
  •  Zinc dosing should begin as soon as the weather conditions (warm, humid, grass minimum temperature more than 13"C, heavy dew or 3-4 mm rain) favour spore growth and/or at the first signs that spore counts are beginning to rise.
  • Don't wait until dangerous conditions arise, or until clinical cases are seen.
  • Remember that the spore rises precede clinical symptoms by some 10-14 days,  and to be effective zinc must be dosed before or at the time the animals graze toxic pasture.
  • Farmers regularly monitoring spore counts early in the season could delay starting dosing until counts begin to rise (don't wait until they reach danger level). It usually takes more than a week for the earliest spore rise of a season to reach danger levels, so starting dosing immediately spore rises begin should provide adequate protection.
  • On problem farms in particular begin dosing in mid-January and continue throughout the autumn.
  • Stock should not be exposed to zinc unnecessarily and excessively prolonged zinc dosing lowers the safety margin.
How to Start
  • Cows should be introduced to increasing zinc concentrations in water over a period of about 3-5 days. Use one quarter the required dose on day 1, half on day 2, three quarters on day 4, etc. Increase the rate more quickly if spore counts are rising rapidly.
  •  Troughs on the reticulated system in paddocks that have not been grazed should be primed with zinc sulphate at the rate of 1 gram/litre (0.7 gram/litre monohydrate).
When to Stop
  • Continue dosing through the expected FE season. 
  •  Towards the end of the FE season dosing can stop when spore levels fall to low levels and weather conditions are dry and cool. But watch the weather and start dosing again if conditions favour spore growth again.
  • If possible avoid dosing continuously for more than 100 days.
  • After long-term zinc dosing ceases, protection will carry over for several days.
Zinc Toxicity
  • Overdosing with zinc is toxic. Take care calculating dose rates and weighing or measuring the zinc sulphate.
  •  There is a 3-fold safety margin for dosing zinc over 60 days, i.e. if three times the recommended rate is given it will cause damage to the pancreas after about 60 days.
  • The safety margin for dosing for longer periods is progressively reduced. Hence the need to use the correct dose rates, and avoiding unnecessary dosing for long periods.
  • Pancreatic injury must be severe before effects on animal health are noted. The pancreas will recover when zinc dosing ceases.
  • Direct addition of zinc sulphate to the trough or poorly designed dispensers can result in very high zinc concentrations in the water immediately after the zinc sulphate is added. This can give excessive intakes to animals drinking this water.
  • Later drinking animals can be under-dosed and be left unprotected as incoming water progressively dilutes the zinc concentrations in the trough.
  • Because elevations of zinc occur in liver and kidney (not meat) a withholding period of 1 week should be allowed before animals are slaughtered.
Lactating and Dry Stock
  • When lactating and dry stock are watered from the same water source where zinc is added, the lactating cows will receive a higher daily intake of zinc because of their higher water requirements. 
  • On a weight basis, their consumption of grass and hence spores will also be higher.
Copper and Selenium
  • Long-term zinc dosing may interfere with copper and selenium metabolism, although it has not yet been shown to induce copper or selenium deficiency.
  •  In areas where these minerals are deficient supplement the animals with copper and selenium immediately after zinc administration ceases.
  • Don't give copper supplements during the FE season unless clinical deficiencies exist.  If copper supplements are required use an injectable preparation.
Purity of Zinc Sulphate
The most commonly used form of zinc sulphate is the heptahydrate; this is generally coarse greenish crystal. Also available is the monohydrate form; this is normally a white powder or fine crystal and is freer flowing. It is used at two-thirds the dose rate of the heptahydrate.

Ask the supplier if the zinc sulphate meets the Animal Remedies Board's specifications.


Disclaimer
This material is provided in good faith for information purposes only, and the author does not accept any liability to any person for actions taken as a result of the information or advice (or the use of such information or advice) provided in these pages.